Question:
Are these those Eiffel Tower jeans that we were all dissing a few months ago? I guess anything looks good on a hot girl.
Answer:
U mean these???
Answer:
Well, I can't help but feel she'd look a lot better with a pair of non-tower jeans.
Answer:
That picture is from the Sartorialist website. The girl is beautiful, and she'd still look good wearing a garbage bag. Those jeans, however, look rediculous.
Answer:
stupidest fucking jeans ever. (and i have a pair of cheap monday's coming in)
Answer:
When using images from Sartorialist, please upload to imageshack or something first, and use the img tags for your new picture. blogger.com doesn't allow people to link to their pictures, which is why it's not showing up anymore, AFAIK...
Answer:
She looks ten years older with those jeans...
Answer:
Heinous.
Answer:
I think she needs a floral print vest to complete the ensemble
Answer:
I see this look quickly going the way of the Edsel.
Answer:
anyone have photos of those diaper looking jeans?
Answer:
Is cheap monday the only people making jeans that high or are their other brave(stupid) souls out there? I don't even care though with that picture. My eye doesn't even glance beyond the neck. I honestly don't care what she wears.
Answer:
Am I the only person who thinks she looks nice, or is her face so attractive that even the ugly ass jeans cannot offset it?
Answer:
I think she looks pretty hot - that's why I started the thread. Those jeans could look really bad, but I think she pulls them off in the context of her outfit. The fact that she's impossibly adorable doesn't hurt.
Answer:
Sartorialist posted a pic last spring of
a girl in Balenciagia jean-ish trousers that approached that height, but weren't as high as the cheap mondays.
The girl in the eiffel towers pulls them off pretty well, IMHO. I think the key is having a totally columnar, dancer/model frame. The jacket helps; they might be too much without it. The girl in Balenciaga has maybe too much hip for her pants (and she's pretty thin).
